Before
I start, let me quote the Preamble of our Constitution for the better understanding
of the entire issue. The Preamble of our great Constitution states, ‘WE THE
PEOPLE OF INDIA having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
and to secure to all its citizens JUSTICE
LIBERTY EQUALITY and FRATERNITY….’
And it goes on. The reason why I started with the core of the Indian
Constitution is because the citizens of this country needs to be awaken about
the true spirits of our constitution that our forefathers left behind for
us. Today there is a lot of hullaballoo
about the return of BJP and their poster boy Narendra Modi pitching for the PM’s
post and many people angry with the current government because of
anti-incumbency, inflation and a lot of other
reasons. But have you ever thought how dangerous the alternative that some
people are proposing could be to the cultural fabric of the country?
Today
if we are considering the BJP and its PM candidate Narendra Modi to be a
messiah who’ll move his magic wand and all the problems would be solved
instantly, then I’m really sorry that’s not happening. Whereas the truth is
that he himself is not being able to handle a lot of crisis in Gujarat which he
is elected for in run up for the top most and had instead created a mirage of
development. But we’ll touch upon on that part later. In regard to the core
principles of our Constitution, choosing Narendra Modi or the BJP would be
dangerous precedent. How is it linked to the core principles of our
constitution? Let me decode it to you for your convenience.
BJP
politics of saffronization and the bizarre logic of Hindu dominance backed by
the Sangh Parivar are not unknown to us and Narendra Modi being an erstwhile
Pracharak of the RSS is no exception for it. When we talk about the core
principles of our Constitution, the BJP and especially Narendra Modi fails in
all grounds. Under them, India won’t be a SECULAR
country in its true spirit and I don’t think I need to tell you the reason
for that. The Ayodhya Massacre and Gujarat Riots are still fresh in all our
minds. Nor it would be SOCIALIST as
the BJP and Narendra Modi have always backed big corporates often at the cost
of poor farmers. The issue of giving away lands in throwaway prices to the
Tatas and the Adani Group is most prominent in today’s time. Given Modi’s style
of running a state as an Autocratic ruler, it’s a big question how DEMOCRATIC the functioning of our
democracy would be. And when these three grounds are at fault, obviously India
wouldn’t be a SOVEREIGN REPUBLIC in
its true essence.
Never
quite thought of all these right? But this is not the end. In Modi’s Gujarat,
not all citizens have the Right to JUSTICE
LIBERTY EQUALITY and FRATERNITY.
The victims of the 2002 riots haven’t stilt gotten justice yet in Modi’s
Gujarat nor is there any sort of equality between the majority and the
minority. And when the state government has a draconian law in which you need
to take permission before converting your religion, what kind of liberty do you
expect? Fraternity which in other words stands for brotherhood is nowhere close
to Modi’s divide and rule policy. So when we talk about the core principles of
our Constitution, Modi fails in all grounds. How can you elect a person who
tends to be a threat to what our Constitution propagates?
Many people
tend to compare the BJP and the Congress on the same page. But how fair the comparison
is? If you ask me, it’s in no way a fair comparison. Let me tell you why. Three thousand Indians died
in the violence that Advani’s. Ayodhya gambit produced. In his autobiography
Advani absolves himself by saying little violence happened in the areas his
Rath Yatra had visited, but he is aware of the fires he lit. He led a fired-up
mob to the mosque and then expressed suprise when they razed it and he was
unable to stop them. Modi’s aide and his deputy home minister, Amit Shah, said
in a recent interview to rediff.com’s Sheela Bhatt that the violence in Gujarat
was inevitable given the massacre at Godhra. In his words: “The BJP has nothing
to do with the riots of 2002! The riots were the reaction of the people to the
Godhra incident. The reaction was so huge that the established machinery could
not meet the challenge of these spontaneous reactions.” What he doesn’t say is
that it is that the BJP over the decades had so polarised the state that a
single incident led to a state-wide orgy of revenge. The reason that so much
anger and bitterness and hatred exists in Gujarat is because of the divisive
language and policies of the BJP. These remain unchanged in the era of Modi but
have been papered over by the second aspect to his image.
Congress is often accused guilty for the massacre
of Sikhs, but it must be acknowledged that the party has tried to make up for
all the allegations made to them. Under Sonia Gandhi, we have had a magnificent
gesture to Sikhs in the face of Manmohan Singh. His two terms as Prime Minister
have done much to heal feelings of Sikhs and non-Sikhs offended by the way the
community was treated in Delhi. The other way to judge how effective Congress’s
outreach to Sikhs has been is to observe the politics in Punjab. The fact is
that the Congress has made its peace with Sikhs there. To see this we need to
only go through the names of Punjab’s legislators. Of the 46 Congress MLAs, 33
are Sikh (on the other hand 10 of the BJP’s 12 MLAs are Hindu). It is the Sikhs
who elected Congress to government twice in Punjab after 1984. How different
this is from the BJP in Gujarat, where no Muslim has been given a BJP ticket to
contest in three Assembly and two Lok Sabha elections under Modi. The record
shows that it is not wise to see the BJP and the Congress as being alike, even
if Modi’s popularity has convinced many to see it this way.
Modi recently said that shauchalay (toilet)
should precede devalay (temple). What he tend to forget is that
a couple of years ago, Jairam Ramesh,
the then Union Minister of Rural Development, said that toilets are more
important than temples. When Ramesh had made his statement, Sangh activists – Modi associates – urinated
and kept urine bottles in front of Ramesh’s house. BJP spokespersons accused Ramesh of destroying the fine
fabric of faith and religion in the country. Now that Modi made the same
statement, those spokespersons are silent, although Praveen Togadia criticised
him. Other Sangh members have kept mum on the issue. Many commentators have
come forward to uphold Modi’s statement saying that it represented the soft
side of Hindutva and would help the BJP increase
its electoral strength and that’s what we called double standards.
Before we conclude,
let’s look at the tall claims and criticism that he made during his recent rally
in Delhi. In his speech Modi merely made false assurances of
bringing in a stronger Lokayukta as the party itself has failed to do so in
Gujarat, where Modi is the Chief Minister. The Delhi BJP is making tall claims of bringing in a stronger Lokayukta
if they come to power, while its national leadership is not even willing to
introduce a Delhi-like Lokayukta system in Gujarat. A number of Gujarat
ministers, MLAs and councillors have been indicted by the Lokayukta but even
after the court’s intervention, nothing has been done. Recently Delhi Power minister Haroon Yusuf alleged that Modi had been stating
that power rates in Gujarat were Rs.1.50 but he did not mention that the rate was
applicable only for 30 units. Once you cross that, the bill goes up
substantially. “Modi is just trying to fool the people. In Delhi, if you
consume power till 200 units, you pay only Rs. 2.70
per unit and at least 61% of the population here falls in this category,” he
added. In Gujarat as per social indices, it has
the highest school dropout rate, high malnutrition deaths compared to other
states and low availability of safe drinking water. So now the decision
lies in the sane wisdom of the people of this country in the upcoming 2014
general elections.
For all sorts of bouquets and brickbats feel free to leave a
comment below or mail me at author.vish94@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment